SACRAMENTO: Another circumcision death
March 8, 2013
Brayden Tyler Frazier, an 11-day-old infant, died tonight at UC Davis Children's Hospital in Sacramento, California.
He had been diagnosed with hemophilia following his circumcision which resulted in seizures and later a coma.
Details have been coming to light as a result of the Facebook posts of various family and friends.
It has all happened before.
And, until the non-therapeautic circumcision of infants is banned, it will all happen again.
But this time, it happened in Sacramento, California.
Within the last hour, Brayden Tyler Frazier died after circumcision put him in critical condition.
He started bleeding uncontrollably after he was circumcised Wednesday at UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento.
They tried to use coagulants, platelets, plasma etc. to try and save his life, but to no avail.
His body started having seizures because of it, which lead to his liver and kidneys starting to shows signs of failure.
He was 9 days old when he was circumcised, and he died at 11 days of age.
He was alive and well for 9 days until the day he was circumcised, and it was found that he had hemophilia.
His parents are now grieving at the Lodi Memorial Hospital.
As a Californian who was born and raised in this area, this is very, very close to home for me.
What will happen now?
Here's what will happen.
Just like all circumcision deaths, this one will be swept neatly underneath the rug.
The cause of death will be recorded as "hemorrhaging to death."
Hemophilia will be blamed.
The baby will have died of "organ failure."
No mention is going to be made of his circumcision.
Ever.
Nobody is going to ask why doctors didn't test the child for hemophilia prior.
Everyone will demand nobody bother the parents because they are grieving.
They will not press charges.
They will be complicit in covering up this circumcision, and protecting the doctor that did it.
They may have yet another child, and go on to circumcise him too.
People will keep quiet, and demand others do too.
And so it will continue.
One conservative estimate says that 117 deaths a year happen in the US as a result of circumcision.
Although, a recent study in Brasil suggests that rate is closer to 156 deaths a year.
Because circumcision is performed in healthy, non-consenting children without any medical or clinical indication whatsoever, how is anything above 0 conscionable?
Death is a risk of circumcision.
Were these parents not made aware of this risk?
Do the benefits truly "outweigh" it, as the AAP repeats over and over?
Or was this child's death not important "because he was going to die anyway?"
I hate having to write these.
When will it end?
And, until the non-therapeautic circumcision of infants is banned, it will all happen again.
But this time, it happened in Sacramento, California.
Within the last hour, Brayden Tyler Frazier died after circumcision put him in critical condition.
He started bleeding uncontrollably after he was circumcised Wednesday at UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento.
They tried to use coagulants, platelets, plasma etc. to try and save his life, but to no avail.
His body started having seizures because of it, which lead to his liver and kidneys starting to shows signs of failure.
He was 9 days old when he was circumcised, and he died at 11 days of age.
He was alive and well for 9 days until the day he was circumcised, and it was found that he had hemophilia.
His parents are now grieving at the Lodi Memorial Hospital.
As a Californian who was born and raised in this area, this is very, very close to home for me.
What will happen now?
Here's what will happen.
Just like all circumcision deaths, this one will be swept neatly underneath the rug.
The cause of death will be recorded as "hemorrhaging to death."
Hemophilia will be blamed.
The baby will have died of "organ failure."
No mention is going to be made of his circumcision.
Ever.
Nobody is going to ask why doctors didn't test the child for hemophilia prior.
Everyone will demand nobody bother the parents because they are grieving.
They will not press charges.
They will be complicit in covering up this circumcision, and protecting the doctor that did it.
They may have yet another child, and go on to circumcise him too.
People will keep quiet, and demand others do too.
And so it will continue.
One conservative estimate says that 117 deaths a year happen in the US as a result of circumcision.
Although, a recent study in Brasil suggests that rate is closer to 156 deaths a year.
Because circumcision is performed in healthy, non-consenting children without any medical or clinical indication whatsoever, how is anything above 0 conscionable?
Death is a risk of circumcision.
Were these parents not made aware of this risk?
Do the benefits truly "outweigh" it, as the AAP repeats over and over?
Or was this child's death not important "because he was going to die anyway?"
I hate having to write these.
When will it end?
FONTE: http://joseph4gi.blogspot.it/2013/03/circu...ther-one-i.html
4 commenti:
Spezza il cuore leggere di queste cose, riposa in pace dolce bambino, dolce angioletto volato in cielo dove nessuno potrà mai più farti del male. Spero sia l'ultimo bambino a morire a causa di questa orribile barbaria.
Che cosa orribile da fare a un bambino cosi piccolo!
Povero bimbo....
MEDICI E GENITORI SONO UGUALMENTE RESPONSABILI DI QUESTA TRAGEDIA DELLA FOLLIA UMANA!!!!!!
Posta un commento